University Communications
University Reporter

Evaluation of Chancellor Penney Set by President's Office

Study and Oct. 29 Conference Signal Renewed Student Retention Efforts

Another Health Benefit of Resistance Training Discovered

MacKenzie Set toTackle

Appointments and New Hires

Promoting Massachusetts Resources is Goal of Mass Studies Project

New Provost Committed to Strenthening Academic Excellence

Evaluation of Chancellor Penney Set by President's Office

Board Supports UMass Boston First Campaign

Solve Urban Problems by Working Together, Forum Speakers Urge

University Artists Celebrate Release of New Poetry and Music CD

Spotlights

Campus Notes

In accordance with trustee policy concerning the evaluation of chancellors, President William M. Bulger is undertaking a review of Chancellor Sherry Penney's performance as chief administrator of the Boston campus.

As part of the evaluation process, President Bulger is formally soliciting statements from vice chancellors, administrators, duly constituted campus-wide governing bodies, faculty, and students, as well as from other individuals knowledgeable about the chancellor.

As stipulated by the Trustees and the President, the principal areas for assessing Chancellor Penney include:
• How successful has the Chancellor been in creating a sense of unity, civility, and purpose, as well as momentum and growth on the campus?
• How effective has the Chancellor been in choosing and working with her Provost, Vice Chancellors, and Deans/Directors? Has the Chancellor assisted the administration in maintaining good relations and encouraging good morale among University employees?
• How effective has the Chancellor been in establishing good relations with the faculty, staff and students on the campus?
• How effective has the Chancellor been in supporting, maintaining and enhancing the quality of the academic mission of the campus?
• Has the Chancellor successfully maintained and enhanced relations with alumni and with external funding agencies, such as foundations and federal agencies? Has she assisted the campus and the University in maintaining good relations with the state legislature?
• How effective has the Chancellor been in projecting an attractive image of her institution to the people of the Commonwealth?
• Has the Chancellor assisted the campus in developing well-articulated and detailed planning documents and policies? Has she provided mechanisms for implementing and revising policies and plans? Has she successfully explained plans and policies ?
• Has the Chancellor effectively supervised the overall allocation of campus resources such as budget, personnel and physical plant?
• How well has the Chancellor worked with the President and the Board of Trustees?
• In light of the fundamental changes affecting higher education today, how effectively has the Chancellor led the campus, enabling it to face future challenges?
• How effective has the Chancellor been in restructuring, reallocating, and reinvesting resources to improve institutional quality?
• Has the Chancellor responded to state needs?
• How effective has the chancellor been in developing industrial relations, seeking sources of private fundraising, and pursuing other forms of external support?

Faculty, administrators, students and staff interested in expressing their opinions about the Chancellor's performance in these areas are invited to send written statements by October 27, 1999 to President William M. Bulger, University of Massachusetts, 1 Beacon Street, 26th floor, Boston, MA. 02108.

An evaluation team will also visit the campus to meet with various groups and constituencies. A notice will be published with the dates and times of the evaluation team's visit.

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

I UMASS Boston Home Page I Contact us I

Last modified:
Thursday, September 30, 1999