- By Anne-Marie Kent
On
November 16, the New York Times reported that nationwide, industrial
production had fallen 0.8 percent in October the sharpest decline
since September 2001. Such news raises questions: How can U.S. manufacturers
increase production? Are some manufacturers more productive than others?
What are the top performers' secrets? Further, what can community
planners and policy makers do to attract these productive manufacturers
firms that are also good employers to their communities?
UMass Boston economics professor David Terkla and co-authors Peter
B. Doeringer and Christine Evans-Klock present answers to these and
other questions in their new book, Start-Up Factories: High-Performance
Management, Job Quality, and Regional Advantag, published in December
by Oxford University Press. "For business owners, the book shows
the successes you can have implementing high-performance management
practices in your firm," says Terkla, who teaches economics and
works with UMass Boston's Greater Boston Manufacturing Partnership.
"For local officials and planners, the book describes the kinds
of firms that tend to do very well, thriving and providing jobs. It
also outlines some of the things government officials can do to make
an area become attractive to these desirable firms."
Terkla and his co-authors sampled 48 new branch plants of large manufacturing
companies in the United States that began operating between 1978 and
1990. These plants represent three industries that cover a wide range
of technologies, products, and production processes. They are located
in three different geographic regions that were chosen for their differences
in labor markets and labor relations, in addition to average education
levels of the workforce.
"We looked at the extent to which companies adopted what are called
high-performance management practices,'" says Terkla.
These include intensive technical training on the job, the use of production
teams with fluid job assignments, and the encouraging of workers to
collaborate with supervisors to help in solving production and quality-control
problems. The book confirms that the best-practice manufacturing companies
are raising productivity and lowering unit costs by introducing these
innovative high-performance management practices.
The authors suggest that these same practices that raise productivity
appear to work best when they are combined with high-wage, relatively
secure and otherwise good jobs, at least in their sample of start-ups.
"Industry by industry, these high-performance start-ups generate
good jobs at a faster rate than the average firm generates average jobs,"
says Terkla. Most offer their core workforces high job security through
explicit employment guarantees, widespread use of buffer stocks of temporary
workers, and relatively high rates of employment growth.
Terkla and his co-authors warn, however, that there's a catch.
Many companies, they say, do not reap the full benefits of these high-performance
practices because the practices are not accompanied by corresponding
adjustments in other management strategies and because they are not
combined with appropriate incentives for their employees to cooperate
with change. Says Terkla, "Simply adopting high-performance manufacturing
practices per se is not enough. This is important for business people
to see, because there was a lot of lip service given to these. If they
didn't really commit to it in an integrated sort of fashion, they
didn't do as well."
High-performance management practices are most effective, says Terkla,
when they are embedded in a large set of management strategies, ranging
from taking workforce attitudes into account when choosing business
locations to the sharing of managerial power and authority with employees.
The book also offers concrete proposals for how to accelerate productivity
growth while raising earnings and job security. According to the book,
U.S. firms' adopting high-performance management practices can
in fact enhance productivity growth in U.S. manufacturing. "As
new high-performance plants replace older, traditionally-managed plants,
there should be corresponding increases in productivity, wages, and
jobs for front-line manufacturing workers with no more than high school
degrees," says Terkla.