Readers Guide Comment on “global standard for labeling of emission footprints”
Environmental footprint accounting has been well developed by civil society organizations, university researchers, and government agencies. While recognizing this groundbreaking work, WEF does not indicate what needs to be improved or what a public-private collaboration could now contribute to the methodological issues. In this context, it seems more interested in opening the door for modifications by those in the corporate world, which has mostly criticized ecological footprinting over the years.
The Readers' Guide welcomes comments with alternative examples or counter examples, supplemental assessments of the extracted GRI text or commentary – critical or otherwise – of the above interpretation of GRI’s perspective.